 |
| Samsung L200 test photos |
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Thursday, June 26, 2008
How To Reduce Face Swelling Wisdom Tooth
Review Samsung L200
Review Samsung L200
image quality 61/100
The small Samsung packs 10 megapixels on a small 1 / 2, 33 "sensor. In order to tackle with such packed sensors resulting noise, Samsung has developed a new image processing. The noise reduction is greater for older cameras and goes even at low ISO values significantly to work. At full magnification to see the photos then as they had applied a watercolor filter. Fortunately, the resolution is sufficient to do this when viewing on a Full HD LCD is not directly noticed. Samsung has achieved is that most buyers of this camera, this problem remains hidden likely (at least if they do not take photos with sensitivities over ISO 400). The lens makes a very good idea for a camera of this class and shows no major weaknesses. The distortion is very limited, and the sharpness is good, at least in the middle. Especially close-ups with flash are quite detailed. In the corners, but the resolution is clearly from. In landscape photography it is by direct incidence of excessive sun lens flare effects seen in the sample gallery. White balance and exposure are generally good, the camera tends to underexpose rather than to over-exposure, presumably to avoid bright areas disappear. The dynamic range is somewhat limited.
video quality 47/100
Samsung advertises that the camera uses a modern MPEG 4 compression. As far as right, the format is very compact and some other manufacturers require. Sorry, but the compression is much too strong and artifacts blur the image and appear as large blocks. Also occur every few seconds Aberrations in the form of blocks to taking about 1 / 15 of the image. The sound is quiet and poorly understood. In darkness, often hardly anything to be seen. Too bad you could have done much more with it.
performance / features 70/100
The L200 is pretty fast and does a good job of focusing on - except in the dark. Although the camera has an auxiliary light for such cases, this results in 50% of cases, but few reports and a note that the focus was not successful. Just to use at discos or self-portraits in the dark, not really. Here, several efforts are needed before the camera focuses. A moving object is the AF also not behind, a chase mode would have been nice. A surprise are the many manual controls, here you have almost the control as a bridge camera. In addition to ISO, white balance, etc. that is, for example, the exposure time can be set manually. Since everything is easily reached and operated a nice option. In addition, there are also some preset scene modes.
operation 82/100
The menu will indeed win any beauty contests, but is clear and well thought out. All settings will be saved easily by hand, and the logical layout of the buttons to scroll through menus often. The scene was much better adjusted, but otherwise there are no complaints.
total 65/100
The Samsung L200 is a nice little camera for its price by 100 € a good investment. Anyone looking for a snapshot camera for the holidays gets a lot for the money. Party Pictures for the camera is only conditionally recommended. Who is expected to be good videos too disappointed. It may be that this could eliminate a firmware update error in the video function. 
Review Samsung L200
image quality 61/100
The small Samsung packs 10 megapixels on a small 1 / 2, 33 "sensor. In order to tackle with such packed sensors resulting noise, Samsung has developed a new image processing. The noise reduction is greater for older cameras and goes even at low ISO values significantly to work. At full magnification to see the photos then as they had applied a watercolor filter. Fortunately, the resolution is sufficient to do this when viewing on a Full HD LCD is not directly noticed. Samsung has achieved is that most buyers of this camera, this problem remains hidden likely (at least if they do not take photos with sensitivities over ISO 400). The lens makes a very good idea for a camera of this class and shows no major weaknesses. The distortion is very limited, and the sharpness is good, at least in the middle. Especially close-ups with flash are quite detailed. In the corners, but the resolution is clearly from. In landscape photography it is by direct incidence of excessive sun lens flare effects seen in the sample gallery. White balance and exposure are generally good, the camera tends to underexpose rather than to over-exposure, presumably to avoid bright areas disappear. The dynamic range is somewhat limited.
video quality 47/100
Samsung advertises that the camera uses a modern MPEG 4 compression. As far as right, the format is very compact and some other manufacturers require. Sorry, but the compression is much too strong and artifacts blur the image and appear as large blocks. Also occur every few seconds Aberrations in the form of blocks to taking about 1 / 15 of the image. The sound is quiet and poorly understood. In darkness, often hardly anything to be seen. Too bad you could have done much more with it.
performance / features 70/100
The L200 is pretty fast and does a good job of focusing on - except in the dark. Although the camera has an auxiliary light for such cases, this results in 50% of cases, but few reports and a note that the focus was not successful. Just to use at discos or self-portraits in the dark, not really. Here, several efforts are needed before the camera focuses. A moving object is the AF also not behind, a chase mode would have been nice. A surprise are the many manual controls, here you have almost the control as a bridge camera. In addition to ISO, white balance, etc. that is, for example, the exposure time can be set manually. Since everything is easily reached and operated a nice option. In addition, there are also some preset scene modes.
operation 82/100
The menu will indeed win any beauty contests, but is clear and well thought out. All settings will be saved easily by hand, and the logical layout of the buttons to scroll through menus often. The scene was much better adjusted, but otherwise there are no complaints.
total 65/100
The Samsung L200 is a nice little camera for its price by 100 € a good investment. Anyone looking for a snapshot camera for the holidays gets a lot for the money. Party Pictures for the camera is only conditionally recommended. Who is expected to be good videos too disappointed. It may be that this could eliminate a firmware update error in the video function.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Dishlex Global 300 Skip Pre Wash
Review Kodak V1253
review Kodak V1253
image quality 66/100
fall after a detailed examination of the images on the computer, unfortunately, some problems in the eye. Unfortunately, even with Kodak This camera once again provided a very high compression for the captured JPEGs, no different settings are possible. An image of 12 megapixels is so only 1.5 to 2.3 MB. The effects show up only if you enlarge the picture and details are smeared by compression artifacts. Disappointing is that the lens also recorded very strong and dramatically loses its sharpness in the corners. From a Schneider Kreuznach lens, I would have expected more. As for the noise from ISO 200 shows this quite strong, and the noise suppression destroyed more details. At ISO 64 are the photos up on the error caused by the lens in order, a slight noise is However, even here in the shadows of the already visible. Moreover, the dynamic range of the sensor is not very good and bright areas appear "overexposed" often. The white balance is often not working as it should. Remedy is often only the targeted use of the matching program mode.
As for the wealth of detail it provides usually no better results than a good 6 MP camera. If you catch one the right attitude and situation, however, can also arise good shots. Just a pity that the results are not consistently good.
video quality 74/100
A main selling point of the V1253 is the HD video mode. And this is actually pretty good. The videos are not very much more detailed than VGA pictures are good, but quite clear and have nice colors. The sound is in stereo and has a camera for a good quality. On a 4 GB card about 40 minutes of HD video to fit in best quality. This is in today's ticket prices quite acceptable, with an 8 GB card is already fairly well equipped. During the recording can be zoomed, but this is heard quite clearly in the tone and the picture is during the Zommer hardly can recognize and stands only a short time later, a right again. Also a VGA mode, and higher compression levels are adjustable. Overall, a coherent package. HD sharpness one should not expect, however
performance / features 60/100
The display of the Kodak is a good size and has good resolution. An optical viewfinder does not have the camera. Unfortunately, no optical image stabilization, this camera would have done really well. The focus is just about fast enough, but comes with super high-speed Casio or Canon did not cooperate. For sports photography, the speed is often not. Very long, the camera also needs to turn on and off, take up to five seconds here. time to pack away so quickly falls into the water. The surprise package with a nice camera bag, but a tribute to Kodak. The finish is ok, unfortunately the only case of plastic, but looks fairly robust.
operation 90/100
The operation is very simple and well thought out. It's fun to use the V1253. The menu system is clear and concise, all important functions are within easy reach and there are many points for their own keys.
total 67/100
The Kodak V1253 is a nice camera that is a pleasure to use. Unfortunately it has some problems in image quality and can not really convince. Especially this one could finally expect from a 12 MP camera. How many other 12 MP Kodak suffers from the same species of small sensor and far too much compression. 
review Kodak V1253
image quality 66/100
fall after a detailed examination of the images on the computer, unfortunately, some problems in the eye. Unfortunately, even with Kodak This camera once again provided a very high compression for the captured JPEGs, no different settings are possible. An image of 12 megapixels is so only 1.5 to 2.3 MB. The effects show up only if you enlarge the picture and details are smeared by compression artifacts. Disappointing is that the lens also recorded very strong and dramatically loses its sharpness in the corners. From a Schneider Kreuznach lens, I would have expected more. As for the noise from ISO 200 shows this quite strong, and the noise suppression destroyed more details. At ISO 64 are the photos up on the error caused by the lens in order, a slight noise is However, even here in the shadows of the already visible. Moreover, the dynamic range of the sensor is not very good and bright areas appear "overexposed" often. The white balance is often not working as it should. Remedy is often only the targeted use of the matching program mode.
As for the wealth of detail it provides usually no better results than a good 6 MP camera. If you catch one the right attitude and situation, however, can also arise good shots. Just a pity that the results are not consistently good.
video quality 74/100
A main selling point of the V1253 is the HD video mode. And this is actually pretty good. The videos are not very much more detailed than VGA pictures are good, but quite clear and have nice colors. The sound is in stereo and has a camera for a good quality. On a 4 GB card about 40 minutes of HD video to fit in best quality. This is in today's ticket prices quite acceptable, with an 8 GB card is already fairly well equipped. During the recording can be zoomed, but this is heard quite clearly in the tone and the picture is during the Zommer hardly can recognize and stands only a short time later, a right again. Also a VGA mode, and higher compression levels are adjustable. Overall, a coherent package. HD sharpness one should not expect, however
performance / features 60/100
The display of the Kodak is a good size and has good resolution. An optical viewfinder does not have the camera. Unfortunately, no optical image stabilization, this camera would have done really well. The focus is just about fast enough, but comes with super high-speed Casio or Canon did not cooperate. For sports photography, the speed is often not. Very long, the camera also needs to turn on and off, take up to five seconds here. time to pack away so quickly falls into the water. The surprise package with a nice camera bag, but a tribute to Kodak. The finish is ok, unfortunately the only case of plastic, but looks fairly robust.
operation 90/100
The operation is very simple and well thought out. It's fun to use the V1253. The menu system is clear and concise, all important functions are within easy reach and there are many points for their own keys.
total 67/100
The Kodak V1253 is a nice camera that is a pleasure to use. Unfortunately it has some problems in image quality and can not really convince. Especially this one could finally expect from a 12 MP camera. How many other 12 MP Kodak suffers from the same species of small sensor and far too much compression.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
A Sweet Litlle Melodi
Kodak V1253 First Thoughts
Today I got it - the Kodak V1253. After you have heard about Kodak compact cameras lately not much positive I was suspicious that the camera has actually delivers what it promises - detailed 12 MP photos, HD video, and easy operation. 
Today I got it - the Kodak V1253. After you have heard about Kodak compact cameras lately not much positive I was suspicious that the camera has actually delivers what it promises - detailed 12 MP photos, HD video, and easy operation.
After opening the package, you can not complain first, the camera looks good and has an impressive display. Moreover, even a handy pocket camera is there - something is not found often. For the current market price of 160 euros the first looks pretty good.
After power is one of an introductory video (!) Welcomes probably know this something new and be a nice idea. The menu also looks good and all settings are easily accessible. The display is very big and fun.
As for the inner values see the first pictures and videos of good and the sound of the video is recorded in stereo and relatively good quality. At first glance, the pictures are very consistent and the automatic is achieving good results. More details soon to follow in the detailed test.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)